Friday, May 29, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Epic user interface fail of Homeric proportions
Nearly pissed myself laughing at this one. So to speak.
peripatetic axiom: Epic uer interface fail of Homeric proportions
peripatetic axiom: Epic uer interface fail of Homeric proportions
Monday, May 18, 2009
The Five Essential Phone-Screen Questions
Stevey's Home Page - The Five Essential Phone-Screen Questions�
Without further ado, here they are: The Five Essential Questions for the first phone-screen with an SDE candidate:
1) Coding. The candidate has to write some simple code, with correct syntax, in C, C++, or Java.
2) OO design. The candidate has to define basic OO concepts, and come up with classes to model a simple problem.
3) Scripting and regexes. The candidate has to describe how to find the phone numbers in 50,000 HTML pages.
4) Data structures. The candidate has to demonstrate basic knowledge of the most common data structures.
5) Bits and bytes. The candidate has to answer simple questions about bits, bytes, and binary numbers.
The FizzBuzz test & programmers ... or not
Coding Horror: Why Can't Programmers.. Program?
Simple test for programming skills:
Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100.
But for multiples of three print "Fizz" instead of the number and for the multiples of five print "Buzz".
For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print "FizzBuzz".
See also:
See also :http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/
All teachers of programming find that their results display a 'double hump'. It is as if there are two populations: those who can, and those who cannot, each with its own independent bell curve. Almost all research into programming teaching and learning have concentrated on teaching: change the language, change the application area, use an IDE and work on motivation. None of it works, and the double hump persists. We have a test which picks out the population that can program, before the course begins. We can pick apart the double hump. You probably don't believe this, but you will after you hear the talk. We don't know exactly how/why it works, but we have some good theories.
So true. I see this in all my programming subjects!!!
Simple test for programming skills:
Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100.
But for multiples of three print "Fizz" instead of the number and for the multiples of five print "Buzz".
For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print "FizzBuzz".
See also:
Separating Programming Sheep from Non-Programming Goats
it seems fundamental skills are not being understood:See also :http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/research/PhDArea/saeed/
All teachers of programming find that their results display a 'double hump'. It is as if there are two populations: those who can, and those who cannot, each with its own independent bell curve. Almost all research into programming teaching and learning have concentrated on teaching: change the language, change the application area, use an IDE and work on motivation. None of it works, and the double hump persists. We have a test which picks out the population that can program, before the course begins. We can pick apart the double hump. You probably don't believe this, but you will after you hear the talk. We don't know exactly how/why it works, but we have some good theories.
So true. I see this in all my programming subjects!!!
Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Friday, May 08, 2009
So I want to use the JAX-WS RI with JDK 6, so I need the endorsed directory right?
Gerard Davison's Blog: So I want to use the JAX-WS RI with JDK 6, so I need the endorsed directory right?: "javax.xml.ws.spi.Provider.DEFAULT_JAXWSPROVIDER"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)